Reasonable Faith with William Lane Craig
LOGIN CENTER
Username  Password
    Forgot Password?
Registered users have access to additional online resources. Register now or learn more about registration.
Search this Site
William Lane Craig
DR. CRAIG
DEBATES
- ARTICLES -
Scholarly
Popular
AUDIO-VISUALS
NEWSLETTER
OPEN FORUM
Q & A
PODCASTS
BLOG
OTHER LANGUAGES
LINKS
email to a friend Website FAQ
email to a friend Email to a Friend
print this page Print this Page

On Guard at onguardbook.com

Question 121

Subject: Fine-Tuning and Improbability


|

Question:

Dr. Craig,

I'm interested in how the teleological argument can escape the criticism of some who would argue that if an infinitesimally improbable event such as a finely-tuned Universe could warrant belief in a God, then how what about other incomprehensibly improbable events?

For instance, imagine a possible Universe that is much larger than our own, in which there are only two small space rocks in existence, but they are located on different edges of the Universe. The possibility of these two small rocks colliding is fantastically improbable, but if it did theoretically happen, would that warrant a supernatural explanation?

Ariel


Dr. Craig responds::

If you read the work of Intelligent Design theorists, Ariel, you’ll find that none of them appeals to the simple high improbability of an event or thing as a basis for a design inference. Your own existence, for example, is due to the incredibly improbable union of a certain sperm and a certain egg, yet we would not infer on that basis that your conception was intelligently designed.

The dean of the contemporary Intelligent Design movement William Dembski argues that in addition to high improbability there also needs to be conformity to an independently given pattern. When these two elements are present, we have what Dembski calls “specified complexity,” which is the tip-off to intelligent design. Thus, for example, in a poker game any deal of cards is equally and highly improbable, but if you find that every time a certain player deals he gets all four aces, you can bet this is not the result of chance but of design.

Now in your example, if the two rocks collided, you would infer neither design nor chance as the best explanation, but the third alternative, physical necessity. Since gravitation acts over infinite distances, it is actually inevitable that those two masses will eventually collide. What would warrant a design inference would be if the rocks were to break into pieces which then came together to spell “Welcome to the Milky Way.”

To detect design look for high improbability conjoined with an independently given pattern.

All active news articles
© 2007 Reasonable Faith. All rights reserved worldwide. Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Content Powered