The thread title is not a direct quote is it? Maybe you should get a job with the Daily Heil or the lying Scum (Scouse for The Sun).
The title strongly suggests that Nandy wants male rapists in female prisons - which she did not say.
I found the weird way the woman asking the questions kept looking at the surreptitious camera - well weird.
There were a lot of people in that room yet the questioner seemed to think she was the only one who had the right to ask questions: going on and on and on ...
Also note her saying something like, "wide dialogue on this issue is important, but no meaningful dialogue is possible with the other side".Those that dissent to be removed from the party.The face of authoritarian tolerance.
Nandy's answer was that "trans women are women and trans men are men" not "male rapists should be in women's prisons".
The point about the questioner's weirdness was in a separate paragraph: it was a separate point.
Quote from: lapwing on March 05, 2020, 10:27:39 pmThe point about the questioner's weirdness was in a separate paragraph: it was a separate point.Well look, probably a feminist. Maybe even lesbian feminist. I agree that they may come off as "weird". However, it's still possible that they occasionally make a fair point...