The "one" word is in the headline - it's the key word in the headline. .
One word in a headline, even if arguably exaggerated, doesn't mean it's a bad piece of analysis. Rather, you're nitpicking. Language is sometimes a bit exaggerated to make a point.
That, and you're attacking a publisher rather than the content of the article. Obvious fallacy of a response.
I see you quickly descend to personal insult.
As you're giving nothing of substance, as per normal, I just pointed this out. Yes, that's slightly personal I guess. But for the most part, it's fair to be dismissive of your post.
You're the one that started attacking sources when it means next to nothing here. So er, you can't really complain if I give you a taste of your own medicine. I quickly "descended" because you *started* on that level!